Wednesday, March 18, 2020
Secession Debated Essay Example
Secession Debated Essay Example Secession Debated Paper Secession Debated Paper Secession Debated BY love_allY123 History 2110, Secession Debated Reading Worksheet For any six of the following items (you may omit any one of the following, except Joe Brown), A) define each orators position B) list 2 or 3 of their major arguments C) choose 1 or 2 quotes that you think best typify their position, or quotes that you find particularly striking. 1. Thomas R. R. Cobb Delivered his speech in Milledgeville on November 12, 1860 and the night before in Athens. Thomas was a very well educated man and served as a longtime clerk on the Georgia Supreme Court. He wrote many books on Georgia Laws nd Supreme Court Manuals. He also wrote a book called Law of Negro Slavery which highlighted his practice of restraint, control and puritanical Christianity views. Clearly he was a secessionist being a faithful Georgia man however his speech isnt all fire and war. He promoted control rebellion with specific reasons as to why secession is a viable option. In his speech he focuses on the effort of the northern states and frequently condemns Personal Liberty Laws. The parties are all dead, let them be buried and with them let us bury all the political and personal animosities which they have engendered and as brothers, as riends, as Georgias sons, let us come and take council together, how we shall avenge her wrongs, promote her prosperity and preserve her honor. The exclusion of half the states of the union has been decreed and we are called upon to record the fiat. Will you do it men of Georgia? 2. Robert Toombs was a faithful Georgia man and an a vid secessionist. His eloquence and passion allowed him to win over many antebellum Georgians with the speech he gave on November 13th, 1860 in Milledgeville. He served as a Georgia congress representative in 1846 the on the Senate in 1851; clearly a politically seasoned man. He starts his basic speech with a straight up call to action. We have not sought this conflict; we have sought too long avoid it; our forbearance has been construed into weakness, our magnanimity into fear until the vindication of our manhood, as well as the defense of our rights is required at our hands. The door of conciliation and compromise is finally closed by our adversaries and it remains only to us to meet the conflict with dignity and firmness of men worthy of freedom. The continues his speech with the unfair treatment of the south as if it were some nothing but barren land and derision. He talks about how the north is more favored than the south and says so in his next quote. Thus stands the account between the North and the South. Under its ordinary and most favorable action, bounties and protection to every interest and every pursuit in the North, to the extent of at least fifty millions per annum, besides the expenditure among them, thus making the treasury a perpetual fertilizing stream to them and their industry and a suction pump to drain away our substance and parch up our lands. 3. Alexander Stephens was a Georgian representative in The United States House of Representatives before and after the civil war and served as the Vice President of the Confederate States of America during the war. He was very good friends with Robert Toombs and it threw him for quite a loop when Stephens gave a unionist speech. These first two quotes from his speech was one that really stood out to me being the he Just stated what he thought so plainly and gives this situation a different feel. He is telling his fellow Georgians that nationalism is more important than having a southerner in office. He is playing the you should know better card and trying to make it seem like he is putting trust into these men. My countrymen, I tell you frankly, candidly, and earnestly, that I do not think that they ought. In my Judgment, the election of no man, constitutionally chosen to that high office, is sufficient cause to Justify any State to separate from the Union. It ought to stand by and aid still in maintaining the Constitution of the country. l trust, my countrymen, you will be still and silent. I am addressing your good sense. I am giving you my views, in a calm and dispassionate manner, and if any of you differ with me, you can on some other occasion give your views, as I am doing now, nd let reason and true patriotism decided between us. In my Judgment, I say, under such circumstances, there would be no possible disgrace for a Southern man to hold office. No man will be suffered to be appointed, I have no doubt, who is not true to the Constitution, if Southern Senators are true to their trusts, as I cannot permit myself to doubt that they will be. 4. Benjamin Hill was a unionist who gave his speech November 16, 1860. Hill was a U. S. Representative, U. S. senator, and a confederate senator from Hillsboro. He also ran for governor against Joseph Brown but was unsuccessful. He was also known as the peerless orator due to his eloquence and verbosity. A quote that really stuck out to me was this next one because it seemed to me like he was saying as Georgians they should not get mad at the Union for these recent aggressions since they happen so frequently they should not be talking about secession since that is a part of their everyday life. ignity, to our self-respect as Union men and Southern men, to have a cessation of these aggressions and an end to these disturbances. I do not think we should wait for any further violation of the Constitution. The Constitution has already been violated and even defiled. These violations are repeated every day. We must resist, and to attempt to resist and not do so effectively even to the full e xtent of the evil will be to bring shame on ourselves, our State, and our cause 5. Henry Benning gave his secessionist speech on Monday evening of November 19th, 1860. Benning was a Jack of all trades, he was a lawyer, legislature, and a Judge on the Georgia Supreme Court; man knew his way around the legal system, clearly. Fort Benning is actually named after him. His speech was very compelling and started off trange, it certainly got my attention more so than the others and was probably a breath of fresh air compared to the wait it out political views of the unionists. Bennings strong use of comparisons really makes his speech so much more entertaining and persuading. I almost feel compelled to secede after reading it. But this quote shows it more so that the injustices that the south has faced are more ugly, like a disease. l say that a separation from the North would be a complete remedy for the disease a complete remedy for both diseases, a remedy not merely to prevent abolition, but lso to heal the fugitive slave ulcer 6. Joseph E. Brown, governor of Georgia at the time sent out a letter on the 7th of December, 1860. Being a slave holder he strongly supported secession and with this letter he inflated popular vote from 51% to 58% to secede. He starts out his letter with three propositions, three questions attempting to Justify secession in the common mind. He was basically asking are you sure this is what you want? to the common people. Then he goes on basically double checking the reasons why they should secede and if they are Justifiable or not. However my favorite quote, which is oward the end is this next one. He Just states so plainly how he feels and does not apologize for what he says, well he is the governor so he doesnt really have to. My honest convictions are, that we can never again live in peace with the Northern abolitionists He then ends his speech with this next quote after persuading the audience that they should not be fighting each other but their common enemy. My fervent prayer is, that the God of our fathers may inspire the Convention with wisdom, and so direct their counsels as to protect our rights and preserve our liberties to the latest generation. I find Thomas Cobbs speech the most mesmerizi ng and compelling out of all of these. Like the book described in Thomass short bio before the speech one listener declared that is was the best speech he had ever heard and that he should definitely deliver it in Milledgeville. Since Thomas was already a man familiar with politics and slavery due to his books that he had written before I believe he was more than qualified to make a speech such as he did. I found it compelling, heartfelt and genuine. Because of it was a speech given so genuinely and so desirously I honestly felt like seceding after reading it. Because he started out very humble saying he is a common man then slowly eased into Lincoln being elected and if that is grounds for secession then talks about the constitution and condemns the Personal Liberty Laws and goes into four points of secession and what really are the grounds for it. Lastly he ends his speech thwarting the Fugitive Law of the Federal Government. I believe it was a well-planned, well invoked speech that got the point across clearly to the common man which was important back then since they took a popular vote on secession, 166 130 favored secession so clearly they got the point somehow.
Monday, March 2, 2020
8 Amateur Mistakes You Must Avoid at Work
8 Amateur Mistakes You Must Avoid at Work Sometimes getting jobs, changing jobs, and dreaming about dream jobs takes up so much of our career energy that we forget to focus on the job weââ¬â¢re in now. Take care not to make careless mistakes or get too complacent. Make sure youââ¬â¢re not guilty of any of the following blundersand then go back to daydreaming.1. Playing politicsIt never pays to be cutthroat, backstab, or even to go in the other direction and be sickeningly nice to everyone. People can read a phony from miles away. Donââ¬â¢t be one.Rather than constantly posturing, stick to your own personality, smoothed over a bit to maintain your professionalism, of course. Be genuine.2. Over-taskingMulti-tasking is one thing- and a very valuable skill, but it can be overdone. When you have too much on your plate, some projects will get lost in the shuffle. Keep your head, choose your priorities, and stay focused on one thing at a time whenever possible. That means not answering emails or texts during meetings, and actually listening when your colleagues speak.3. WhiningNobody likes all aspects of their job. But everyone appreciates a positive attitude. Keep quiet about what makes you most disgruntled, even if you really wish you could blast it on Twitter for sheer catharsis. Focus on what you can change, and stay quiet about the rest. If things are really all that bad, start looking for another job.4. Promising too muchWe all want to be the hero and say ââ¬Å"yesâ⬠whenever called upon. But itââ¬â¢s important to make sure you can deliver on the promises you make. Donââ¬â¢t overextend yourself and end up disappointing people. Help whenever you can, and push yourself to greater heights, but stay honest and donââ¬â¢t let expectations get away from you.5. StruttingKnow your place. If youââ¬â¢ve just started in a company, donââ¬â¢t walk around like the C.E.O. You have to earn your coworkersââ¬â¢ (and bossââ¬â¢s) respect over time. That way, when you run the place, everyo ne will still like you, as well as fear you.6.à Being antisocialDonââ¬â¢t just mainline a salad at your desk, or grab lunch with only your team every day as if nothing else- not even the rest of the company- exists. Donââ¬â¢t forget to make friends that arenââ¬â¢t necessarily working with you on a day-to-day basis. It will help you maintain a work-life balance, even at the office. And it helps you make more connections and develop a more diverse profile at your company and in your field.7. Not answering opportunityââ¬â¢s knockEven if you like your job, you shouldnââ¬â¢t turn a blind eye to new opportunities. You never know when a better position or more exciting opportunity will come your way. It pays to be prepared.8.à Letting small failures keep you downWe all make mistakes. What we should all do is learn from them. It keeps us from making even more mistakes, keeps us humble, and keeps us improving ourselves in hopes of greater and greater success.
Saturday, February 15, 2020
Social Thought & Social Change Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words
Social Thought & Social Change - Essay Example There has been a ââ¬Å"social changeâ⬠in United States (Cornish, 1993, pp. 162). Various sociologists belonging to different school of thoughts have interpreted social change differently. In particular, notion of Social Change will under evaluation according to the works of Karl Marx and Max Webber. Marx simply defined social change as something, which emerges from class conflict, and this social change might be in the form of revolutions and not necessarily peaceful (Tischler, 2007, pp. 14). Weberââ¬â¢s ideas on social change were not economically based like that of Marx, but he emphasized that social change is brought about by ideas and ideals (Denhardt, 2004, pp.26). Society has undergone various transformations; the theories of Marx and Weber highlight how social change brought about these transformations. The paper explains the theories of Marx and Weber to explain the concept of ââ¬Å"post industrialistâ⬠society. Bell does not really define post industrialist s ociety as a transition into service industry. Bell places great emphasis on scientific knowledge in this era and this scientific knowledge is a catalyst for social change (Mackay, Maples, Reynolds, 2001, pp. 24). Postindustrial era emerged after the Second World War that saw immense technological developments some of which included the transformation of matter into energy, atom bomb and the first digital computer (Bell, 1973, pp. 339). The character of ââ¬Ëknowledgeââ¬â¢ itself stands out in postindustrial societies. The main features of a postindustrial society include that of an increase in the size of the service industry, extensive use of machinery, an increase in the amount of information technology and knowledge and creativity standing out (Society, n.d, n.p). Karl Marx was particularly focused on the inequality perpetuated by capitalism. He argued that a particular technology did not define capitalism, and was the relation of social forces within the capitalist society that was significant. In the sense, that the people who owned the means of production and the workers who worked on these means of production had an important relationship. Although technology was vital to the process but it resulted only ââ¬Å"as consequence of the relationship between those who produce surplus value and who appropriate itâ⬠(Jordan, Pile, 2002, pp.102). The works of Marx itself were based on the industrialist society. However, various contemporary Marxist theorists have identified that the conflicts within the framework of work, which occurred in industrial society have still not been removed with the introduction of the post industrialist era, also widely known as Information Communications Technology (ICT). In addition, even Bell has identified that the landowner and soldier were central figures in pre-industrial society and the businesspersons in industrial society, largely scientists and researchers dominate the postindustrial society (Cornish, 1993, pp. 162). Marxists therefore would emphasize that the scientists and researchers have the ââ¬Ëeliteââ¬â¢ knowledge, which is in the hands of the powerful few. Hence, there is inequality in the society. Furthermore, there has been an integration of ICT into the manufacturing world. This is an addition of modernity to the trend, which Marx had established. Therefore, according to Marxists, ICT is a ââ¬Ë
Sunday, February 2, 2020
A Sense of Environmental Consideration Research Paper
A Sense of Environmental Consideration - Research Paper Example Ecological deterioration results from several sources. However, these sources can fall under two categories namely natural and anthropogenic causes. Anthropogenic causes of environmental degradation include industrial activities, mining, agriculture and developmental infrastructure. The success of all these activities revolves around the modification of the environment in several ways. The constructions of industries require space. As such, vegetations are cleared to create space for such constructions. This renders the soil void of vegetation, thus, exposes it to threats of soil erosion (Nemeth, 2012). This leads to environmental degradation through loss of soil fertility, thus reducing the agricultural potentials. This culminates to food crises. The loss of vegetation through environmental degradation is critical n causing the issues of global warming. This follows that there will be little or no vegetation to absorb the temperature as well as the light from the sun. In addition, t he loss of vegetation means little incidences of surface albedo (Nemeth, 2012). Therefore, the surface reflectivity of the sunââ¬â¢s rays will be hampered. This means that more heat will be absorbed by the surface of the soil and will be released gradually to the atmosphere. This causes global warming. The increased temperatures in the atmosphere may affect the ozone layer, causing its depletion. This may be responsible for changing the weather patterns thereby affecting several activities on the global perspective. Environmental degradation may also follow the activities of several industries.
Friday, January 24, 2020
Canterbury Tales - Linking Griselda of The Clerks Tale to the Biblical
Linking Griselda of The Clerk's Tale and the Biblical Sacrifice of Abraham à à à à The Clerk's Tale seems to strike most readersà as a distasteful representation of corrupt sovereignty and emotional sadism; few can find any value in Walter's incessant urge to test his wife's constancy, and the sense that woman is built for suffering is fairly revolting to most modern sensibilities. Nevill Coghill, for instance, described the tale as "too cruel, too incredible a story," and he notes that "even Chaucer could not stand it and had to write his marvelously versified ironic disclaimer" (104-5). It seems, however, even more incredible that a great poet should bother composing a tale for which he himself had little taste; that is, there must be some point, however strange, to the ordeal of Griselda. One of the words Chaucer frequently uses to describe her character is sadness. The word obviously had a very different meaning in fourteenth-century England from what it has today: In Chaucer it does not denote a depressed moral or psychological sta te, but a way of reacting to events which takes them thoroughly seriously without letting them disturb one's internal composure. This kind of sadness can best be understood in terms of the biblical models Griselda follows. She explicitly echoes the Stoic resolve of Job when she declares, "Naked out of my fadreshous, ...I cam, and naked moote I turn again" (871-2) [this quote needs a / to show line breaks and should use spaced periods with square brackets for ellipses]. But the allusions to Job may momentarily throw the reader off the trail of an even stronger biblical model: the story of Abraham's sacrifice of Isaac à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à The affinities b... ...ch the "intoxicated security of the flesh" (in à à à à à Calvin's phrase), puffed up in its own satisfaction at an unbroken system à à à à à of moral debts and repayments, is negated by the knowledge of an à à à à à intractable sinfulness, and in which all human activity turns out to have à à à à à been an anguished cry for forgiveness.à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à Works Cited: à à à à à à Benson, Larry. Ed. The Riverside Chaucer. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., à à à à à 1987. à à à à à à Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Clerk's Tale.The Riverside Chaucer.Ed. Larry à Benson. Boston: Houghton à à à à à Mifflin Co., 1987. 137-53. à à à à à à Coghill, Nevill. The Poet Chaucer. London: Oxford University Press, 1967. à à à à à à à à à à Kierkegaard, Sà ¸ren. Fear and Trembling.Trans. Walter Lowrie. Princeton: à à à à à PrincetonUniversity Press, 1941.
Thursday, January 16, 2020
Letter / Apollo Shoes
First I would like to thank the board of director of Apollo Shores for their recent inquiry about Phoenix & Companyââ¬â¢s services. Since our firm is small, we offer a wide range of personalized services to clients at a reasonable cost. Phoenix & Company is a CPA firm with more the 25 years in the business of providing client tax services, accounting booking, management consulting, quality control consulting, risk assessment, capital transaction assistance, and information systems functionality. The firmââ¬â¢s approach has been very successful because of our ability to comprehend our clientsââ¬â¢ organization paradigm including risk assessment, control issues, and diagnostic. The benefits to our auditing approach would help the management team efficiency identify areas within the organizationââ¬â¢s that needs to be address. This process could improve the companyââ¬â¢s efficiency identifying that controls are in place. Overall this gives the management team a better understanding of the organization working including their financial systems. The role of Phoenix & Company is to obtaining sufficient audit evaluation and evidence in order to test the organizational controls. At this time I would like to define auditing and give some benefits of an audit. ââ¬Å"Auditing is the accumulation and evaluation of evidence about information to determine and report on the degree of correspondence between the information and established criteriaâ⬠(Arens, Elder & Beasley, 2006). The benefits to auditing are the ability for a company to improve the understanding of the financial records from the management and users stand points. Another benefit is the ability to identify areas within the organization that needs improvement. A company could reinforce, risk assessments, and improve internal controls. In conclusion the firm of Phoenix & Company is an excellent resource to provide Apollo Shores with effective analysis, and relevant information to meet the needs of your organization. The approach is to improve the organization safeguards in order to protect the financial operations of the company.
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Differences Between Hamlet And King Claudius - 745 Words
In the story Hamlet by Shakespeare, Hamlet and his uncle, King Claudius, come across as the two main characters that cause the most conflict. Due to the murder of former King Hamlet, Hamlet debates on whether suicide is the only way to cope with the death of his father, until he later finds out his uncle, current king, and step-father is responsible for his father à s death. Hamlet and the new King then plan for each others death, which takes a turn for the worst. The differences and similarities between these two characters are pronounced, and they deserve thorough examination. Hamlet displays as the depressed, crazy Prince that lost his mind after the death of his father. Polonius tries to understand why Hamlet is acting not his normalâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Ã¢â¬Å"I have murdered my own brother. I cannot even pray, though I wish to do soâ⬠(Act 3, Scene 3). The king claims he feels sorrow for his crime, but is not willing to give away what came from it to have his si ns forgiven. ââ¬Å"My crown, my ambition, and my queenâ⬠(Act 3, Scene 3). He is strictly only worried about what benefits him the most. Toward the end, he tries to get rid of Prince Hamlet because he realizes Hamlet is a problem towards his elegant life. Claudius says in the text, ââ¬Å"Do not delay. He must be out of here tonightâ⬠(Act 4, Scene 3). Although, his villain qualities are very strong, the love he has for Queen Gertrude seems real and sincere. Due to many betrayals the king did, Hamlet had it out for him, which soon led to the death of way more people than needed. The similarities between these two characters of Hamlet, is that they both truly feel for Queen Gertrude. Despite the hate they have each other, the love for the queen for the both of them stay sincere. They also are very manipulative, as in how Hamlet made everyone believe he has gone crazy and Claudius had fooled everyone on what had really happened with the death of his brother. On the contrary , Claudius is very selfish and Hamlet is selfless. King Claudius strictly only cares about what benefits him, although Hamlet does not care about benefits him the most. Hamlet also doesnââ¬â¢t seem to mind what people think of him, but Claudius seems as if the opinionShow MoreRelatedHamlet : The Difference Between Hamlet And King Claudius873 Words à |à 4 PagesHamlet, possibly one of the most infamous plays, by the most acclaimed poet to ever live. A tragic story full of love, betrayal, revenge, and death, and at the hull of it all young Hamlet, caught in the mix of it all, a prince from Elsinore, Denmark whose only wish is to avenge his father. I will be analyzing the difference between Hamlet and King Claudius.Letââ¬â¢s start with some background knowledge of the play, King Claudius, of Denmark, before the play starts does a atrocious act and poisons OldRead MoreMarxist Literary Theory In ââ¬Å"Hamletâ⬠. Marxism Is A Theory1011 Words à |à 5 PagesMarxist Literar y Theory in ââ¬Å"Hamletâ⬠Marxism is a theory based on ââ¬Å"a materialist interpretation of historical development and a dialectical view of social transformationâ⬠(Wikipedia, 2017) by philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism focuses on social contradictions and the struggle between socioeconomic classes, which are proletariat, who are the poor people and the working class; and bourgeoisie, the rich people that control the means of production. Marxist theory states that the onlyRead More The Foils of Laertes and Fortinbras in Hamlet Essay1031 Words à |à 5 PagesThe Foils of Laertes and Fortinbras in Hamletà à à à à à William Shakespeare wrote the classic play, Hamlet in the sixteenth century.à Hamlet would be a very difficult play to understand without the masterful use of foils.à A foil is a minor character in a literary work that compliments the main character through similarities and differences in personality.à The audience can identify similarities and differences between any of the characters and Hamlet, however, there are two characters thatRead MoreSimilarities And Differences Between Oedipus The King And Hamlet887 Words à |à 4 Pagesdifferent between Oedipus the King and Hamlet. Oedipus the King was written by Sophocles in 430-425 BCE. Oedipus the King is about King Oedipus finding out his true origins and him fulfilling a prophecy. In order to save his Kingdom Oedipus has to find out who murdered the king before him. Looking for the murderer Oedipus begins to learn about his origins and true self. Hamlet on the other hand is about a Hamlet, the prince of Denmark , trying to avenge his fathers death. There are many differences betweenRead MoreHamlet Allusions1079 Words à |à 5 PagesResearch paper hamlet INTRO Hamlet is a tragedy by William Shakespeare where the main character, Hamlet, Thesis: In William Shakespeareââ¬â¢s Hamlet mythological and biblical allusions informs us of Hamletââ¬â¢s inevitable fall. Throughout the play, Hamlet uses many mythological allusions to show his feelings towards other characters such as Claudius, Gertrude and the old king as well as inform us of his ââ¬Å"fallâ⬠. After Queen Gertrude is re-married to Claudius, Hamlet shows hisRead More Hamlet the Play and the Movie Essay547 Words à |à 3 PagesHamlet the Play and the Movie Hamlet by William Shakespeare is a story about a king that was murdered by his brother and the prince has been asked by his father?s ghost to avenge his murder. The original story line has been altered a few times since it has been written. The original Hamlet the play and the altered Hamlet the movie are shown differently in many different ways. Hamlet the movie with Mel Gibson shows different things than the play, but there are three major differences betweenRead MoreAct I, Scene II928 Words à |à 4 Pages Original Text Act I, Scene II introduces Prince Hamlet, his mother Queen Gertrude, and his uncle Claudius. Due to the recent death of King Hamlet there have been two notable changes in the kingdom. First, Claudius is the new King of Denmark. Act I, Scene II begins with King Claudius expressing appreciation for the support he is receiving from his court and subjects. The second change is that Claudius has married Queen Gertrude. Claudius presents the immediate marriage as a method of overcomingRead MoreHamlet By William Shakespeare s Hamlet948 Words à |à 4 Pagesthought out plans arenââ¬â¢t fool proof as demonstrated in the play Hamlet by Shakespeare. Plots against Hamlet are constantly being thwarted as they happen by Hamletââ¬â¢s wit and luck. The three main plots being: Polonius spying on Hamlet hoping to find out whatââ¬â¢s wrong with Hamlet, Claudius sending Hamlet to England so he can be executed, and Claudius trying to kill Hamlet during a fencing match between Hamlet and L aertes. Although Hamlet does end up dead in the end of the play, it was of great cost toRead MoreDifferences Between Hamlets Mental/Emotional Conflicts and Beowulfs Physical Battles960 Words à |à 4 PagesDifferences between Hamlets mental/emotional conflicts and Beowulfs physical battles Beowulf is an epic poem from an unknown author. The main point and theme of Beowulf is about heroism of a warrior with courage who becomes an epic hero; not only by his strength in the battles but also by his social obligations. In Williams Shakespeareââ¬â¢s play, Hamlet, Hamletââ¬â¢s mental and emotional conflict is based on a tragedy of revenge. It is the differences of Beowulf and Hamlet, that also make it the sameRead MoreHamlet V. Claudius Essays1181 Words à |à 5 PagesHamlet vs. Claudius: A Fight to Remember In the literary classic, Hamlet by William Shakespeare, controversy meets corruption. The monarch of Denmark, King Hamlet, is murdered by his jealous brother, Claudius. While the son of the king, Prince Hamlet, is away at school, Claudius seizes the throne and marries the adulterous Queen Gertrude. Hamlet returns to Denmark finding his father dead, his mother remarried, and his uncle the king. Grief succumbs Hamlet and his only relief is from the
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)